Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Thought for the Day

  • Feb. 3rd, 2008 at 6:56 PM
yes, 21, two riders were approaching, all in, of cabbages and kings, run lola run, You're not of the body, bee sea, magic shadows, i am not a number, seeing the world after april, Circe Invidiosa, Ayizan, gender, Test Card F, politics, fascism, brain thoughts, best pilot evah, java, why i love saturn, default, unless, haiti, i had an accident, open the bay doors HAL, politics and strange bedfellows, weather underground, being dead like me, Timey-Wimey Detector

What does neutrality mean? Do people who publish about malaria deaths need to be neutral about malaria?

— Les Roberts, co-author of The Lancet paper, "Mortality before and after the 2003 invasion of Iraq: cluster sample survey"

Tags:

Comments

[info]hellsop wrote:
Feb. 4th, 2008 12:17 am (UTC)
Perhaps "neutral about malaria" is the dispassion to not presuppose that malaria is God's curse on brown people for living in abominable places. I haven't read the paper, though.