Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

More TTC Factoids

  • Apr. 27th, 2008 at 5:51 PM
yes, 21, two riders were approaching, all in, of cabbages and kings, run lola run, You're not of the body, bee sea, magic shadows, i am not a number, seeing the world after april, Circe Invidiosa, Ayizan, gender, Test Card F, politics, fascism, brain thoughts, java, best pilot evah, why i love saturn, default, unless, haiti, i had an accident, open the bay doors HAL, politics and strange bedfellows, weather underground, being dead like me, Timey-Wimey Detector
  • Between 1991 and 2001 the City of Toronto grew by 9% but transit funding was cut by half in the same time period. Funding cuts led the TTC to cut the bus fleet by 22% and to close two operating garages.
  • The TTC is more reliant on revenues from fares than any other transit system in the developed world.
  • The TTC is the only major transit system in the developed world to fund regular operations entirely from the property tax base and from fares.
  • In Toronto, 80% of the TTC's operating budget is paid by riders. This compares with 58% in Montreal, 46% in Vancouver, 59% in New York and 52% in Chicago. The Canada-wide average is 62%. In the US, the overall average is 41%.
  • Fares have more than doubled since 1990 and ridership has fallen by 10%.
  • The Province of Ontario used to provide 50% of the operating costs for the TTC but under the Harris Tories, this was eliminated entirely.
  • Capital investment per capita in public transit in Canada, at US$60, is less than half the recent level of investment in Seattle, New York, Denver and San Francisco.

I think that these numbers are a coupl'a years out of date (I think they're for 2005) but I don't think they've changed that much in the last few years.

Comments

[info]suitablyemoname wrote:
Apr. 27th, 2008 11:17 pm (UTC)
They have and they haven't. What we're seeing right now is what I call "subwaying".

Biggest problems at the moment:
- Near-annual fare hikes driving down ridership.
- Crumbling infrastructure, especially subway signals, subway stations, warehouses and car barns, streetcar loops, bus and streetcar stops and shelters, and a website that hasn't had any significant change since 1999. (It sounds small, but while cities like Seattle have route finders and web-based predictions of when the next bus will arrive at a stop and a fare calculator and online help and promotional materials, we've got HTML that hasn't been standards-compliant since the Geocities era.)
- Shortage of operators.

But what's all the money going to? Building a light rail network by 2020 and extending the Spadina subway 3-4 stations. Both of these are important projects in their own way, but focusing on them won't actually address the endemic issues that the system's been facing for a decade now. The politicians are focusing on highly-visible projects like subways into new parts of the city rather than on projects that would improve the system as it stands: "subwaying".
[info]the_axel wrote:
Apr. 28th, 2008 12:57 am (UTC)
Which is because federal & provincial governments want to spend money on capital projects that they can announce 4 or 5 times with a photo-op each time rather than the much less sexy work of funding operations.

Makes me want to beat Liberals & Tories over the head with a big stick.
[info]dragon3 wrote:
Apr. 28th, 2008 10:48 pm (UTC)
I don't have the facts to hand for post secondary education, but I know they paint a similar picture. Rather than tar any flavour of provincial government, I would tend to lay the blame on transfer payments that no longer reflect reality.